By Lauren Hockenson, Giga Om
Facebook on Thursday announced the final phase of removing an old privacy feature from the social media platform. The feature, which allows users to be hidden from search, will finally be taken away for users who have it enabled.
The feature, called "Who can look up your Timeline by name?" was removed from Privacy settings last year (noted in a December blog post) for those who didn't have it enabled. When enabled, the setting removes the ability for users to access a Timeline profile via search, even when a user puts in the exact name of the person he or she is locating. Now, users that still have that feature enabled will begin to see removal notices from Facebook, indicating that they will be present and visible in Graph Search along with the rest of the Facebook user base.
Facebook says in the blog post that the feature is a vestigial precaution that reaches back before the platform had a sophisticated search algorithm. When Facebook search acted as a mere directory, removing oneself from search made it more difficult for strangers to access a given profile. But now, as Open Graph opens up to search more settings and there is greater visibility of Timelines for friends of friends, the importance of finding a person through search has diminished while controlling the content on any given Timeline has become more important. Facebook says that the feature also caused hiccups in the user experience:
"People told us that they found it confusing when they tried looking for someone who they knew personally and couldn't find them in search results, or when two people were in a Facebook Group and then couldn't find each other through search."Of course, the sunsetting of this feature for those who care about it the most only stresses the importance of checking and updating Facebook privacy settings often. Now, it's more important to consider the content of the Timeline itself: a "private Timeline" is only such when content is marked explicitly "Friends Only." As Facebook continues to make search easier, it's important to keep in mind how these changes impact social media privacy at large.
By Michelle Roberts
Canadian doctors say they have found an inventive way to treat lazy eye - playing the Tetris video game.
The McGill University team discovered the popular tile-matching puzzle could train both eyes to work together.
In a small study, in Current Biology with 18 adults, it worked better than conventional patching of the good eye to make the weak one work harder.
The researchers now want to test if it would be a good way to treat children with the same condition.
UK studies are already under way.
An estimated one in 50 children has lazy eye, known medically as amblyopia.
“Start QuoteIt's much better than patching, much more enjoyable, it's faster and it seems to work better” - Dr HessLead researcher
It happens when the vision in one eye does not develop properly, and is often accompanied by a squint - where the eyes do not look in the same direction.
Without treatment it can lead to a permanent loss of vision in the weak eye, which is why doctors try to intervene early.
Normally, the treatment is to cover the strong eye with a patch so that the child is forced to use their lazy eye.
The child must wear the patch for much of the day over many months, which can be frustrating and unpleasant.
Learning through playDr Robert Hess and colleagues in Montreal set out to investigate whether a different approach might work.
Armed with a special pair of video goggles they set up an experiment that would make both eyes work as a team.
Nine volunteers with amblyopia were asked to wear the goggles for an hour a day over the next two weeks while playing Tetris, the falling building block video game.
The goggles allowed one eye to see only the falling objects, while the other eye could see only the blocks that accumulate on the ground in the game.
For comparison, another group of nine volunteers with amblyopia wore similar goggles but had their good eye covered, and watched the whole game through only their lazy eye.
At the end of the two weeks, the group who used both eyes had more improvement in their vision than the patched group.
The researchers then let the patched group have a go at using the goggles with both eyes uncovered. Their vision then improved significantly.
Patching 'may be hindrance'Dr Hess said the treatment could be a good alternative to patching, particularly for adults because they tend not to benefit from this anyway.
And any number of computer games could work - not just Tetris.
He said: "When we get the two eyes working together, we find the vision improves.
"It's much better than patching, much more enjoyable, it's faster and it seems to work better."
He said his research and other studies suggest amblyopia is actually a two-eye problem and that patching the good eye may hinder rather than help the weak one.
Forcing both eyes to co-operate increases the level of plasticity or adaptability in the brain and allows the weak eye to relearn how to see, he said.